Tag Archives: representation


De Rijke/De Rooij

derijke-derooij-bouquet IV-1

derijke-derooij-bouquet IV

De Rijke/De Rooij, ‘Bouquet IV’ (2005)

Bouquet IV, which consists of a specific flower arrangement, as well as a black and white photograph of the arrangement in a matte aluminum frame, “was organized so that its colors in black and white reproduction translate into a relatively small range of grey-shades, resulting in an even spread of tones from which high contrasts and extremes on either side of the spectrum are excluded.”


Luis Camnitzer

Luis-Camnitzer-the discovery of geometry-1978

Luis Camnitzer, ‘The discovery of geometry’ (1978)


Mary Jacobus

“Hubert Damisch’s study, A Theory of /Cloud/ (1972), makes /cloud/ the sign of painting’s paradoxical combination of the ephemeral and the material. Above all, it signals the escape of painting from the dominance of perspective and its historical transformation; the problem of surface became the problem of illusion. By the use of two forward slashes, Damisch transforms /cloud / into an index or signifier, rather than a word denoting “cloud” in any descriptive or figurative sense. Enslaved to linear perspective (so Damisch argues), painting seeks another way of representing visual experience. /Cloud/, whether rendered as the absence of sky or as deceptive trompe l’oeil, poses an alternative to the linear order. It becomes a sign of all that painting has to overcome. Instead of organizing the limits of a flat surface, the illusionistic clouds of the painted baroque cupola overflow their architectural frame. Correggio, according to Damisch, was the first to construct his pictures from the point of view of a Kantian subject for whom space is a constitutive aspect of consciousness.

Damisch’s semiotic analysis of pictorial production takes the theme and texture of /cloud/ as an indexical case-study for the development of painting, making /cloud/ the defining problematic of painting from the baroque to the present day. This “pictorial” or “painterly” space – what he calls “a free and unlimited depth, considered as a luminous and aerial substance” – is opposed to a modernist emphasis on linear style, with its flatness and overlapping forms. /Cloud/ is the sign of the volume repressed by modern painting’s fixation on the flatness of the representational surface. Its semiotics challenge the insistence of twentieth-century modernism on the representation of painterly space. Clouds round out pictorial space instead of flattening it; they point to the organization of the pictorial as a dialectic of surface and depth. /Cloud/ negates solidity and shape. Nebulous and indefinite, it signals an indeterminate volume, defying the medium and restoring painting to the realm of illusion. But /cloud/ also contains the paradox of form which signifies itself.”

From: ‘Cloud Studies: The Visible Invisible’, by Mary Jacobus


Robert Watts

Robert Watts, “Table with Two Wine Glasses” (1965)

Robert Watts, ‘Table with Two Wine Glasses’ (1965)


Luis Camnitzer

Camnitzer Luis

Luis Camnitzer, ‘La Fotografía’ (1981)


Ger van Elk

Ger Van Elk_Zig Zag River I, 1979

Ger van Elk, ‘Zig Zag River I’ (1979)


Ad Rheinhardt

adrheinhardt2

adrheinhardt

Ad Rheinhardt in his studio.


B. Wurtz

bwurtz-untitledredfrisbee

Untitled (Frisbee) (1984) by B. Wurtz


Marijke van Warmerdam

marijkevanwarmerdam_zoekenenvinden2008

Marijke van Warmerdam, ‘Zoeken en vinden’ (2008)


Eva Olthof

eva-olthof

‘The Image After’ by Eva Olthof.

The Image After is a performative presentation, which consists of three parts. It deals with questions concerning archaeological objects, their (early) photographical representations and cultural heritage in times of chaos. The first part discusses an assembly of images that depicts archaeological objects belonging to a museum in Beirut. These objects were stolen just after the civil war ended in 1991 and still remain missing.